Comparison Overview

Gomez Trial Attorneys

VS

Legal Services Board

Gomez Trial Attorneys

755 Front St, San Diego, California, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Gomez Trial Attorneys is the largest plaintiffs'​ trial firm located in San Diego. We are a team of San Diego personal injury attorneys and we handle cases ranging from catastrophic injury to wrongful death and several others including insurance disputes, elder abuse and business disputes. Over the past decade, we have earned more than $350 million in verdicts and settlements for our clients. That includes more than 50 settlements of more than $1 million and 20 verdicts of at least $1 million. We have also won the largest wrongful death verdict in California, that being $106 million. In addition to our San Diego personal injury and wrongful death practices, we also work tirelessly for children's rights. Several children's rights lawyers work at the firm and we protect their rights with regards to physical harm, psychological abuse and bullying. Several San Diego personal injury attorneys at the firm dedicate their practices to representing consumers who have been injured by large corporations. These types of cases, known as mass torts in the legal world, involve situations relating to defective drugs and medications, environmental torts that affect residents and defective products matters. Finally, everyone who works at Gomez Trial Attorneys is committed to giving back to the community in every way possible. We host and sponsor several events throughout the year and work to bring attention to the causes to which we donate our time and other assets. If you have been harmed by someone else and you want to have your legal rights and options evaluated for free, contact a San Diego personal injury attorney at the Gomez Trial Attorneys to schedule a free initial consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Services Board

2 Dyott Street, London, WC1A 1DE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is the independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. It is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Ministry of Justice. Its costs are met entirely by a levy on the approved regulators of the legal profession. The LSB is both politically and financially independent of Government. The LSB was created by the Legal Services Act 2007 with a statutory mandate to deliver eight regulatory objectives including ensuring that regulation in the legal services sector is carried out in the public interest; and that the interests of the consumers of legal services are put at the heart of the legal system in England and Wales. The LSB became fully active on 1 January 2010, when the new regulatory regime was activated by statute. The LSB is responsible for appointing the Legal Services Consumer Panel as well as the Office for Legal Complaints, the body responsible for overseeing the Legal Ombudsman scheme.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gomez-law-firm.jpeg
Gomez Trial Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gomez Trial Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Services Board
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gomez Trial Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Services Board in 2025.

Incident History — Gomez Trial Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gomez Trial Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Services Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Services Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-gomez-law-firm.jpeg
Gomez Trial Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legal-services-board.jpeg
Legal Services Board
Incidents

FAQ

Both Gomez Trial Attorneys company and Legal Services Board company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legal Services Board company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gomez Trial Attorneys company.

In the current year, Legal Services Board company and Gomez Trial Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Services Board company nor Gomez Trial Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Services Board company nor Gomez Trial Attorneys company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Services Board company nor Gomez Trial Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys company nor Legal Services Board company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys company nor Legal Services Board company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gomez Trial Attorneys company employs more people globally than Legal Services Board company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gomez Trial Attorneys nor Legal Services Board holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X