Company Details
legal-services-board
63
3,665
5411
legalservicesboard.org.uk
0
LEG_1262913
In-progress

Legal Services Board Company CyberSecurity Posture
legalservicesboard.org.ukThe Legal Services Board (LSB) is the independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. It is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Ministry of Justice. Its costs are met entirely by a levy on the approved regulators of the legal profession. The LSB is both politically and financially independent of Government. The LSB was created by the Legal Services Act 2007 with a statutory mandate to deliver eight regulatory objectives including ensuring that regulation in the legal services sector is carried out in the public interest; and that the interests of the consumers of legal services are put at the heart of the legal system in England and Wales. The LSB became fully active on 1 January 2010, when the new regulatory regime was activated by statute. The LSB is responsible for appointing the Legal Services Consumer Panel as well as the Office for Legal Complaints, the body responsible for overseeing the Legal Ombudsman scheme.
Company Details
legal-services-board
63
3,665
5411
legalservicesboard.org.uk
0
LEG_1262913
In-progress
Between 750 and 799

LSB Global Score (TPRM)XXXX



No incidents recorded for Legal Services Board in 2025.
No incidents recorded for Legal Services Board in 2025.
No incidents recorded for Legal Services Board in 2025.
LSB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is the independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. It is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Ministry of Justice. Its costs are met entirely by a levy on the approved regulators of the legal profession. The LSB is both politically and financially independent of Government. The LSB was created by the Legal Services Act 2007 with a statutory mandate to deliver eight regulatory objectives including ensuring that regulation in the legal services sector is carried out in the public interest; and that the interests of the consumers of legal services are put at the heart of the legal system in England and Wales. The LSB became fully active on 1 January 2010, when the new regulatory regime was activated by statute. The LSB is responsible for appointing the Legal Services Consumer Panel as well as the Office for Legal Complaints, the body responsible for overseeing the Legal Ombudsman scheme.


PFB Law, Professional Association, is a full service law firm dedicated to meeting the legal needs of businesses and individuals across Minnesota and western Wisconsin. For 40 years, we have been dedicated to providing effective, expedient and innovative legal services for each and every client. Alt

About. Civility. Integrity. Compassion. You can expect us to be understanding and sensitive to your circumstances and you will receive counsel that is seasoned by experience and maturity. We put children first and display civility always. Melissa Doss Law is a small, agile firm located in Northern K
Premonition.ai is an Artificial Intelligence system that mines Big Data to find out which Attorneys win before which Judges. It is a very, very unfair advantage in Litigation. Premonition also has the World's Largest Litigation Database - Bigger than every major litigation database combined: •

In May 2021, AdvanceLaw was acquired by Mitratech, a proven global technology partner and trusted provider of end-to-end solutions designed to help corporate legal, HR, risk, and compliance teams increase efficiency, manage risk, control costs, and scale for the future. AdvanceLaw offers a white-gl

Webb Ross McNab Kilpatrick Limited is also known as WRMK Lawyers, Northland's largest law firm. Based in four offices across the North, we are proud of our reputation of being there for our clients whenever they need us. We believe in the importance of communication and being accessible, and have a

The law firm of Budow and Noble, P.C., is well recognized in Maryland and the District of Columbia as a leader in the field of civil litigation. Our attorneys are accomplished and unwavering in their professionalism and advocacy. Client service is central to our firm culture, and we pride ourselve
.png)
The Legal Services Board on Thursday launched a public consultation on a draft policy statement aimed at driving greater equality,...
Career paths in management, information technology, law, mission support, public affairs and community outreach are available within the agency.
Our commitment to audit quality. At EY US, we are bringing our bold vision for the future of audit to life with quality at the center,...
Matteo Tonello is the Head of Benchmarking and Analytics at The Conference Board, Inc. This post is based on a Conference Board/ESGAUGE...
San Diego County Board of Education proclaims October 2025 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month. Resolution No. 2025-26 reads:.
Digitalisation has revolutionised healthcare, improving patient services through innovations such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and AI-driven...
To help credit unions of all sizes, we developed a number of resource centers that provide critical regulatory and supervisory information...
After years of drafting, discussions, and debates, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) Board reached a significant milestone in...
Cybersecurity is a board-level concern, yet many chief information security officers (CISOs) struggle to translate technical risks into...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of Legal Services Board is http://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 750, reflecting their Fair security posture.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,Legal Services Board is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Legal Services Board operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.
Legal Services Board employs approximately 63 people worldwide.
Legal Services Board presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Legal Services Board’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,665 followers.
Legal Services Board is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.
No, Legal Services Board does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Yes, Legal Services Board maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/legal-services-board.
As of November 30, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Legal Services Board has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.
Legal Services Board has an estimated 7,389 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Legal Services Board has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include .
.png)
A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.
OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.