Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

E-Land ChinaE-Land China
VS
Marisa S.A.Marisa S.A.
E-Land China

E-Land China

N/A

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://cn.eland.com/
768/1000Fair

Based on 3 core businesses of “Fashion”, “Retail” and “Support & Future Growth”, the ELAND GROUP are expanding success experience into the world to achieve the vision of ‘Global No.1 Fashion & Retail Enterprise’. Retail business of ELAND GROUP has started from the first...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

Rua James Holland, 422 - Barra Funda, São Paulo, 01138-000, BR

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marisa.com.br
805/1000Good

Marisa S.A. is the largest Brazilian department store chain specialized in women’s clothing based on the number of stores in Brazil. The Company’s business strategy and operations focus primarily on middle-lower income women between the ages of 20 and 35. The Company’s ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,806
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
E-Land China

E-Land China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E-Land China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marisa S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - E-Land China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E-Land China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marisa S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marisa S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
E-Land China

E-Land China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marisa S.A.

Marisa S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between E-Land China company and Marisa S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between E-Land China and Marisa S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between E-Land China and Marisa S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - E-Land China or Marisa S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - E-Land China or Marisa S.A. ?
Between E-Land China and Marisa S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between E-Land China and Marisa S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3