Comparison Overview

The DoSeum

VS

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden

The DoSeum

2800 Broadway St, San Antonio, TX, 78209, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The DoSeum is much more than a children’s museum - it’s a place where interactive fun and hands-on learning come together—a place where minds are always at play. The DoSeum offers exhibits, programs, camps, classes, and field trips designed for all learners, encouraging young minds to explore the joy of learning through connections to STEM, the arts, and literacy. Originally founded as San Antonio Children’s Museum in 1995, The DoSeum has grown to become a premier leader in informal education, while still staying true to the mission of connecting families and transforming communities. As a 501(c)(3), The DoSeum is committed to accessible and free programming to low-income San Antonio-area children, with a goal of serving 10,000 kids from Title I schools annually. At 68,000 square feet of interactive exhibit space, The DoSeum’s wow-worthy facility, opened in 2015, inspires each Guest to cultivate their curiosity, ignite learning, and discover the power of play.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden

2101 NE 50th St, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US, 73111
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Since its start in 1902, the Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden has informed and inspired guests to conserve and protect the world's vanishing wildlife and wild places. Today, the 120+ acre park is home to more than 1,100 animals and welcomes more than 1 million visitors from around the world each year. The OKC Zoo is a proud member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, the American Alliance of Museums and Oklahoma City's Adventure District.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 184
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-doseum.jpeg
The DoSeum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/okczoo.jpeg
Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The DoSeum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The DoSeum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden in 2026.

Incident History — The DoSeum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The DoSeum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-doseum.jpeg
The DoSeum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/okczoo.jpeg
Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The DoSeum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The DoSeum company.

In the current year, Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company and The DoSeum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company nor The DoSeum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company nor The DoSeum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company nor The DoSeum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The DoSeum company nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The DoSeum company nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden company employs more people globally than The DoSeum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The DoSeum nor Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N