Comparison Overview

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis

VS

International Centre for Life

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis

3000 North Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46038, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.childrensmuseum.org/

The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is extraordinary—always! Through its world-class exhibits, the museum strives to excite and encourage family learning and curiosity by providing limitless opportunities to create memories and foster a sense of discovery. The mission of The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is to create extraordinary learning experiences across the arts, sciences, and humanities that have the power to transform the lives of children and families. With 472,900 square feet and five floors of family learning, The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is the world’s biggest and best children’s museum. Here you can discover new worlds, talk with real experts, and see authentic artifacts in always-changing exhibits.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 411
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

International Centre for Life

International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, NE1 4EP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.life.org.uk

The International Centre for Life (or ‘Life’ as we’re known) was founded in 2000, a pioneering science village in the heart of Newcastle upon Tyne. We are proudly independent, entrepreneurial and quirky – and we are always interested in hearing from people with the talent, drive and skills to help us continue to make a difference. Our purpose is to inspire everyone to explore and enjoy science, and to provide a world-class science hub where life enhancing engagement, research and patient treatment can thrive. Life Science Centre, which opened in May 2000, is the science centre for the North, with the North’s biggest Planetarium, too. Our varied and exciting engagement programme serves families, schools, adults, pre-schoolers and teenagers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-indianapolis.jpeg
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Centre for Life
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Museum of Indianapolis in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Centre for Life in 2026.

Incident History — The Children's Museum of Indianapolis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Centre for Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Centre for Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-museum-of-indianapolis.jpeg
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Centre for Life company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, International Centre for Life company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company.

In the current year, International Centre for Life company and The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Centre for Life company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life company nor The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Centre for Life company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company.

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis company employs more people globally than International Centre for Life company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Children's Museum of Indianapolis nor International Centre for Life holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References