Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Biltmore Hotel TbilisiThe Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi
VS
ITC Hotels LimitedITC Hotels Limited
The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

29 Shota Rustaveli Avenue, Tbilisi, 0108, GE

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile

The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi is ideally situated within the historic and cultural district of the Georgia’s capital city. Close to the east bank of the Mtkvari River, this hotel is suitable for both business and leisure travellers. The grand lobby echoes the nostalgia of ...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:73
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Limited, Hotels Division - Headquarters, ITC Green Centre 10, Institutional Area Sector 32, Gurugram, Haryana, IN, 122001

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

Established in 1975, ITC Hotels Limited has grown to encompass over 140+ hotels across 90+ destinations, solidifying its presence in the Indian subcontinent ITC Hotels seamlessly blends India’s rich tradition of hospitality with globally benchmarked services, offering ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:12,682
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Hotels Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ITC Hotels Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Hotels Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi and ITC Hotels Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi and ITC Hotels Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi or ITC Hotels Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi or ITC Hotels Limited ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi and ITC Hotels Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Biltmore Hotel Tbilisi and ITC Hotels Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2