Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Ascott LimitedThe Ascott Limited
VS
Hotel Jobs | JobKing.orgHotel Jobs | JobKing.org
The Ascott Limited

The Ascott Limited

168 Robinson Road, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 068912

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
722/1000Moderate

The Ascott Limited (Ascott) is driven by a vision to be the preferred hospitality company, enriching global living with heartfelt experiences. With a portfolio of more than 1,000 properties spanning over 230 cities across more than 40 countries, Ascott’s presence spans ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:5,226
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

Delhi, 110001, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobking.org/
821/1000Good

JobKing - Your Job Search Ends Here! JobKing is the world's largest, most innovative and fastest-growing Hospitality Jobs' portal. It offers better relevance of job search and renders only 100% genuine openings. JobKing.org is an attempt to help you in your job search,...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:16,729
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Ascott Limited

The Ascott Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Ascott Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Ascott Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Ascott Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Ascott Limited

The Ascott Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE3132331101425
Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Ascott Limited company and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Ascott Limited and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Ascott Limited and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Ascott Limited or Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Ascott Limited or Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org ?
Between The Ascott Limited and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Ascott Limited and Hotel Jobs | JobKing.org, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA