Comparison Overview

The Archives of Falconry

VS

LAUNCH Waterloo

The Archives of Falconry

5668 W Flying Hawk Ln, Boise, Idaho, US, 83709
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://falconry.org

The Archives of Falconry was founded in 1986 by several visionary falconers who were also leaders of The Peregrine Fund. We have since grown into a world-renowned repository of falconry material culture and historical records. The Archives collects and preserves falconry heritage and the legacy of notable falconers, including their correspondence, memorabilia, art, crafts, and life stories. The Archives also interprets significant events in falconry history and celebrates the role of falconers in the birth of raptor conservation. We are a destination for falconers, sportsmen and women, scholars, journalists, and other interested public - to visit, support, learn, and explore this 4500-year-old connection between humans and birds of prey.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LAUNCH Waterloo

70 King St N, Waterloo, Ontario, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://launchwaterloo.ca/

LAUNCH Waterloo is a social enterprise with a bold vision: to inspire kids to be creative, ethical, critical thinkers that embrace their own curiosity and imagination. How will we do that? By making STEAM a new sport! We are transforming traditional STEAM programming from one-day or one-week touchpoints to long-term, progressive, fun recreational programs. Adopting a minor sports model, LAUNCH hosts seasons of science, technology, engineering, arts and math programs for children.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-archives-of-falconry.jpeg
The Archives of Falconry
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/launch-waterloo.jpeg
LAUNCH Waterloo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Archives of Falconry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LAUNCH Waterloo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Archives of Falconry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LAUNCH Waterloo in 2026.

Incident History — The Archives of Falconry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Archives of Falconry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LAUNCH Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LAUNCH Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-archives-of-falconry.jpeg
The Archives of Falconry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/launch-waterloo.jpeg
LAUNCH Waterloo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Archives of Falconry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LAUNCH Waterloo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LAUNCH Waterloo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Archives of Falconry company.

In the current year, LAUNCH Waterloo company and The Archives of Falconry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LAUNCH Waterloo company nor The Archives of Falconry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LAUNCH Waterloo company nor The Archives of Falconry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LAUNCH Waterloo company nor The Archives of Falconry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Archives of Falconry company nor LAUNCH Waterloo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Archives of Falconry company nor LAUNCH Waterloo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Archives of Falconry company employs more people globally than LAUNCH Waterloo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Archives of Falconry nor LAUNCH Waterloo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References