Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Aquila SchoolThe Aquila School
VS
PearsonPearson
The Aquila School

The Aquila School

Dubailand, Dubai, Dubai 28291, AE

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
780/1000Fair

The Aquila School is a happy community school with amazing learning at its heart. We are proud to be the flagship school for International Schools Partnership (ISP), a global community of schools with a shared purpose of growing the world’s most curious, confident minds...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pearson

Pearson

80 Strand, London, GB, WC2R 0RL

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://plc.pearson.com/
773/1000Fair

Our purpose is simple: to help people realize the life they imagine through learning. We believe that every learning opportunity is a chance for a personal breakthrough. That’s why our c. 20,000 Pearson employees are committed to creating vibrant and enriching learning ...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:14,753
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Aquila School

The Aquila School

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pearson

Pearson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Aquila School in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pearson in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Aquila School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Aquila School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pearson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pearson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Aquila School

The Aquila School

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pearson

Pearson

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PEA908050925

FAQ

Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Aquila School company and Pearson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Aquila School and Pearson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Aquila School and Pearson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Aquila School or Pearson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Aquila School or Pearson ?
Between The Aquila School and Pearson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Aquila School and Pearson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8