Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » The Apache Software Foundation » THEAQU1774117492

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (THEAQU1774117492)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-20
Company Score Before Incident596 / 1000
Company Score After Incident576 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTHEAQU1774117492
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORForce-push attack on GitHub Action version tags
DATA EXPOSEDCredentials
INCIDENT DATE20/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of The Apache Software Foundation's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts The Apache Software Foundation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the The Apache Software Foundation breach identified under incident ID THEAQU1774117492.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of The Apache Software Foundation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-apache-software-foundation, the number of followers: 79547, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 2368 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 596 and after the incident was 576 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on The Apache Software Foundation and their customers.

Organizations using Trivy GitHub Action recently reported "Sophisticated Supply Chain Attack Compromises Trivy GitHub Action, Exposing CI/CD Pipelines Globally", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In late March 2026, a high-impact supply chain attack targeted the official Trivy GitHub Action (aquasecurity/trivy-action), a widely used security scanning tool in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting CI/CD pipelines using Trivy GitHub Action, and exposing Credentials.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident highlights the escalating risk of supply chain vulnerabilities in CI/CD environments, where trusted dependencies can become vectors for exploitation. Security teams are advised to prioritize strict version control, dependency validation, and continuous monitoring, and recommending next steps like Prioritize strict version control, dependency validation, and continuous monitoring of third-party tools, even those positioned as security solutions.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including supply chain attack targeted the official Trivy GitHub Action, and force-push attack, compromising 75 out of 76 existing version tags. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Serverless Execution: Malicious GitHub Action (T1648.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating malicious infostealer distributed via compromised GitHub Action version tags. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including malicious infostealer designed to exfiltrate credentials, and exposes a vast number of organizations to credential theft. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including malicious infostealer designed to exfiltrate credentials, and data exfiltration mentioned as motivation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing (T1553.006) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised 75 out of 76 existing version tags of a trusted security tool and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating trusted dependencies can become vectors for exploitation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating undermining the very tool meant to secure their pipelines and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of CI/CD pipelines to credential theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (95%)
Execution
Serverless Execution: Malicious GitHub Action (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (95%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (85%)
Defense Evasion
Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing (80%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (75%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)
Service Stop (50%)