Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Thales TransportThales Transport
VS
Network RailNetwork Rail
Thales Transport

Thales Transport

60 Ludgate Hill, London, EC4M 7AW, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hitachirail.com
752/1000Fair

Following the acquisition of Thales Transport by Hitachi Rail, this account is no longer active. Please follow Hitachi Rail for all future updates from our team.​

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Network Rail

Network Rail

The Quadrant MK, Milton Keynes, MK9 1EN, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

We’re at the heart of revitalising Britain’s railway, getting people and goods where they need to be and supporting the economy. Investment and modernisation are essential. So we’re building the railway of the future, running a safe, reliable and efficient railway, and...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:27,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Thales Transport

Thales Transport

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Network Rail

Network Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thales Transport in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Thales Transport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thales Transport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Network Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Thales Transport

Thales Transport

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Network Rail

Network Rail

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Thales Transport company and Network Rail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Thales Transport and Network Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Thales Transport and Network Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Thales Transport or Network Rail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Thales Transport or Network Rail ?
Between Thales Transport and Network Rail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Thales Transport and Network Rail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA