Comparison Overview
TGI Fridays
TGI Fridays
19111 North Dallas Parkway, Dallas, 75287, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
In 1965, TGI Fridays opened its first location in New York City. Today, there are 380 plus restaurants in 30 plus countries offering high-quality, authentic American food and legendary drinks, bringing together all people from all places. The freeing and liberating spir...
Jack in the Box
9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, California, US, 92123
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
TGI Fridays
Jack in the Box
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TGI Fridays in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2026.
Incident History - TGI Fridays (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TGI Fridays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
TGI Fridays
Jack in the Box
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.