Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Texas Health and Human ServicesTexas Health and Human Services
VS
U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

4601 W Guadalupe St. , Austin, 78751, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hhs.texas.gov
779/1000Fair

Overview The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is an agency within the Texas Health and Human Services System. In September 2016, Texas began transforming how it delivers health and human services to qualified Texans, with a goal of making the Health and...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, 20420, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.va.gov/
778/1000Fair

Welcome to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Official LinkedIn page. We're recruiting the finest employees to care for our #Veterans. Following/engagement ≠ signify VA endorsement. This is a moderated page, meaning that all comments will be reviewe...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:198,730
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health and Human Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Texas Health and Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health and Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEP000022425
🔒 Incident : Breach
USD03741222
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
USD11419623

FAQ

Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services company and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Texas Health and Human Services or U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Texas Health and Human Services or U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Texas Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1