Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Texas InstrumentsTexas Instruments
VS
AMDAMD
Texas Instruments

Texas Instruments

12500 T I Blvd, Dallas, 75243, US

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ti.com
836/1000Good

We are a global semiconductor company that designs, manufactures and sells analog and embedded processing chips for markets such as industrial, automotive, personal electronics, enterprise systems and communications equipment. At our core, we have a passion to create a ...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:32,501
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AMD

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amd.com
782/1000Fair

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelli...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:47,977
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Texas Instruments

Texas Instruments

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AMD

AMD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Instruments in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AMD has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Texas Instruments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Instruments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Texas Instruments

Texas Instruments

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AMD

AMD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMDLIN1783614518
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1781267811
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1932419101425

FAQ

Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Texas Instruments company and AMD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Texas Instruments and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Texas Instruments and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Texas Instruments or AMD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Texas Instruments or AMD ?
Between Texas Instruments and AMD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Texas Instruments and AMD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1