Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Republican Party of TexasRepublican Party of Texas
VS
European ParliamentEuropean Parliament
Republican Party of Texas

Republican Party of Texas

., US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.TexasGOP.org
750/1000Fair

To promote a conservative philosophy of government: By promoting conservative principles; and By providing the infrastructure through which those who share our conservative principles can get involved in the political process, run for and be elected to public office, ...

NAICS:8139
NAICS Definition:Business, Professional, Labor, Political, and Similar Organizations
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
European Parliament

European Parliament

60 Rue Wiertz, Brussels, 1047, BE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

The European Parliament is the elected body of the European Union. The Parliament consists of 720 members elected by citizens in EU countries. The Members work in close unison with the Commission and the Council in shaping the laws and policies of the EU. Follow our L...

NAICS:8139
NAICS Definition:Business, Professional, Labor, Political, and Similar Organizations
Employees:10,683
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Republican Party of Texas

Republican Party of Texas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
European Parliament

European Parliament

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Political Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Republican Party of Texas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Political Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for European Parliament in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Republican Party of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Republican Party of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - European Parliament (X = Date, Y = Severity)

European Parliament cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Republican Party of Texas

Republican Party of Texas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REP224525123
European Parliament

European Parliament

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EUR2025241122

FAQ

Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Republican Party of Texas company and European Parliament company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Republican Party of Texas and European Parliament, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Republican Party of Texas and European Parliament, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Republican Party of Texas or European Parliament ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Republican Party of Texas or European Parliament ?
Between Republican Party of Texas and European Parliament, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Republican Party of Texas and European Parliament, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8