Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tetra Tech CoffeyTetra Tech Coffey
VS
ABC ConsultantsABC Consultants
Tetra Tech Coffey

Tetra Tech Coffey

Level 19, 799 Pacific Highway, Tower B, Chatswood, 2067, AU

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Tetra Tech Coffey is part of Tetra Tech, a leading provider of consulting and engineering services worldwide. Our specialists are at the forefront of their field in engineering, geotechnical, occupational hygiene, environmental, and project management services. Across ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:2,382
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABC Consultants

ABC Consultants

1st Floor Eros Corporate Tower, New Delhi, 110019, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abcconsultants.in
783/1000Fair

ABC Consultants is India's leading executive search and talent advisory firm, proudly shaping the future of multinationals and Indian businesses for over 50 years. Our team of 150 consultants spans 21 industry verticals and brings an agile mind-set, an empathetic pe...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:14,271
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tetra Tech Coffey

Tetra Tech Coffey

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABC Consultants

ABC Consultants

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tetra Tech Coffey in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABC Consultants in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tetra Tech Coffey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tetra Tech Coffey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABC Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABC Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tetra Tech Coffey

Tetra Tech Coffey

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABC Consultants

ABC Consultants

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey company and ABC Consultants company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey and ABC Consultants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey and ABC Consultants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tetra Tech Coffey or ABC Consultants ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tetra Tech Coffey or ABC Consultants ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey and ABC Consultants, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tetra Tech Coffey and ABC Consultants, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1