Comparison Overview
TETRA Technologies do Brasil

TETRA Technologies do Brasil
Rod. Amaral Peixoto, Km 159, Rio Das Ostras, 28890-000, BR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Founded in 1981, TETRA continues to apply its 40+ years of expertise in aqueous chemistry to forge the pathway to future success while remaining the ONE trusted leader in the markets we serve. Recognizing that new sources of energy are essential in today’s evolving land...

Amec Foster Wheeler
15 Justice Mill Lane, Aberdeen, AB11 6EQ, GB
Last Update: 09/09/2026
Wood Group has combined with Amec Foster Wheeler to form a new global leader in the delivery of project, engineering and technical services to energy and industrial markets. To find out more about Wood visit our new website at www.woodplc.com For all the latest updates...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TETRA Technologies do Brasil







Amec Foster Wheeler






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TETRA Technologies do Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Amec Foster Wheeler in 2026.
Incident History - TETRA Technologies do Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TETRA Technologies do Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Amec Foster Wheeler (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amec Foster Wheeler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TETRA Technologies do Brasil

Amec Foster Wheeler
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.