Comparison Overview
Tesco Mobile

Tesco Mobile
N/A
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Take the quality and value of Tesco - Stir in the power of O2’s network - And sprinkle on award-winning service. That’s Tesco Mobile. And we’re here to serve you better! At Tesco Mobile, we strive to be helpful in every way possible. Giving you more and going further t...

Telenor
Snarøyveien 30, Fornebu, NO, 1331
Last Update: 09/09/2026
EMPOWERING SOCIETIES. CONNECTING YOU TO WHAT MATTERS MOST. Telenor Group is a leading telecommunications company across the Nordics and Asia with 158 million subscribers and annual sales of around NOK 99 billions (2022). We are committed to responsible business condu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tesco Mobile







Telenor






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tesco Mobile in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Telenor in 2026.
Incident History - Tesco Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tesco Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Telenor (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telenor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tesco Mobile

Telenor
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.