Comparison Overview
Tesco Stores CR, a.s.

Tesco Stores CR, a.s.
Vršovická 1527/68b, Praha 10, undefined, 100 00, CZ
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Tesco patří mezi přední maloobchodní prodejce na českém trhu. Není však „jen“ obchodníkem. Stejně jako o potřeby a přání zákazníků se stará o životní prostředí, společnost, jejíž je součástí, i město, ve kterém působí. Ruku v ruce s tím jde strategie společnosti být vžd...

Auchan Retail
40 avenue de Flandre, BP139, Croix, Lille, FR, 59964
Last Update: 20/05/2026
To create new-generation retailing that improves people’s lives, Auchan Retail places customers at the centre of its actions and reaffirms the retailer’s role: that of a multi-format, “phygital” activist for good, healthy, local produce that constantly reinvents itself ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tesco Stores CR, a.s.







Auchan Retail






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tesco Stores CR, a.s. in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Auchan Retail has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Tesco Stores CR, a.s. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tesco Stores CR, a.s. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Auchan Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Auchan Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tesco Stores CR, a.s.

Auchan Retail
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.