Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tesco BengaluruTesco Bengaluru
VS
Spencer'sSpencer's
Tesco Bengaluru

Tesco Bengaluru

81&82 EPIP Area,, Bengaluru, 560066, IN

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
794/1000Fair

Tesco in Bengaluru is a multi-disciplinary team serving our customers, communities and planet a little better every day across markets. Our goal is to create a sustainable competitive advantage for Tesco by standardizing processes, delivering cost savings, enabling agil...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:4,436
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Spencer's

Spencer's

6826 Black Horse Pike, Egg Harbor Township, 08234, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://SpencersOnline.com
720/1000Moderate

We are a lifestyle retail company with two unique brands located throughout the U.S., Canada, and online. Our Home Office is located just minutes from the beach in Egg Harbor Township, NJ. At Spencer's and Spirit Halloween, we do the right thing always - integrity, fai...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,052
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tesco Bengaluru

Tesco Bengaluru

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Spencer's

Spencer's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tesco Bengaluru in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spencer's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tesco Bengaluru (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesco Bengaluru cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Spencer's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spencer's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tesco Bengaluru

Tesco Bengaluru

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Spencer's

Spencer's

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SPE03321422

FAQ

Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru company and Spencer's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru and Spencer's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru and Spencer's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tesco Bengaluru or Spencer's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tesco Bengaluru or Spencer's ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru and Spencer's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tesco Bengaluru and Spencer's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2