Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Terma GroupTerma Group
VS
Lockheed MartinLockheed Martin
Terma Group

Terma Group

Hovmarken 4, Lystrup, 8520, DK

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.terma.com/
746/1000Moderate

Defense is a silent shield in an unpredictable world. Founded in 1949 and headquartered in Aarhus, Denmark, Terma operates across Europe, the U.S., the Middle East, and Asia. Our high-tech solutions are designed for mission-critical environments where lives and assets a...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:1,902
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 20817, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The world relies on what we do. Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, with offices across the U.S. and around the globe, our team delivers solutions that strengthen national security, shape industries and push engineering and technology to new levels. We collaborate t...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:113,476
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Terma Group

Terma Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Terma Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Lockheed Martin has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Terma Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Terma Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lockheed Martin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockheed Martin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Terma Group

Terma Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TER5592155111325
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOCULANOR1777876145
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC621092125

FAQ

Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Terma Group company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Terma Group and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Terma Group and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Terma Group or Lockheed Martin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Terma Group or Lockheed Martin ?
Between Terma Group and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Terma Group and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA