Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KLK Tensachem S.A.KLK Tensachem S.A.
VS
BayerBayer
KLK Tensachem S.A.

KLK Tensachem S.A.

rue de Renory 28, None, Ougrée, None, BE, 4102

Last Update: 17/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tensachem.com
752/1000Fair

KLK Tensachem, based near Liège, Belgium, is a global, large scale manufacturer of anionic surfactants for the home care and personal care markets. Modern sulph(on)ation capabilities produce in liquid, paste, and powder form. The facility also features their own formul...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:54
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bayer

Bayer

Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE, 51373

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bayer.com/
765/1000Fair

Bayer is a global enterprise with core competencies in the life science fields of healthcare and nutrition. We design our products and services to serve the most essential human needs of health and nutrition. At the same time, we strive to address some of the world’s bi...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:96,269
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KLK Tensachem S.A.

KLK Tensachem S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bayer

Bayer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLK Tensachem S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KLK Tensachem S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLK Tensachem S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bayer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KLK Tensachem S.A.

KLK Tensachem S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bayer

Bayer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAY3934339110325

FAQ

Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. company and Bayer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. and Bayer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. and Bayer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KLK Tensachem S.A. or Bayer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KLK Tensachem S.A. or Bayer ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. and Bayer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KLK Tensachem S.A. and Bayer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8