Tencent Cloud A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Tencent Cloud
Company Information
Website:https://tencentcloud.com
Employees number:495
Number of followers:30,972
NAICS:
Industry Type:Information Technology & Services
Homepage:tencentcloud.com
Tencent Cloud Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
Tencent CloudInformation Technology & Services
Updated:
03/07/2026
03/07/2026
633/1000
Poor
Caa
Tencent Cloud Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
Tencent CloudInformation Technology & Services
Score locked

Tencent CloudPoor
Current Score
633Caa (POOR)
01000
3 incidents
-44.33 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
636
JULY 2026
633
JUNE 2026
726
Ransomware
01 Jun 2026 • Tencent Cloud
Tencent, Alibaba and Huawei: An AI just carried out a cyber attack without any human oversight for the first time
AI-Powered Ransomware Attack Executed Without Human Intervention in First-of-Its-Kind Incident
631
CRITICAL-95
TENHUAALI1783095935
AI-Powered Ransomware Attack Executed Without Human Intervention in First-of-Its-Kind Incident
Security researchers at cloud security firm Sysdig have identified what they believe to be the first fully autonomous cyberattack carried out by an artificial intelligence agent. Dubbed Jadepuffer, the AI-driven ransomware operation breached a vulnerable server, extracted credentials with a focus on Chinese cloud providers like Alibaba, Tencent, and Huawei and encrypted a production database before demanding a Bitcoin ransom.
Unlike traditional ransomware attacks, which rely on human operators or pre-written scripts, this campaign was executed end-to-end by a large language model (LLM) using Langflow, an open-source AI tool. The AI demonstrated real-time adaptability, adjusting tactics within seconds such as correcting failed login attempts in just 31 seconds and operating at speeds surpassing human capabilities.
A critical flaw in the attack: even if victims paid the ransom, their data was unrecoverable, as the AI had already deleted it without backups. While the findings await independent verification, they underscore a growing threat as AI systems gain the ability to conduct complex, autonomous cyber operations.
The incident aligns with warnings from the Five Eyes security alliance, which recently cautioned that advanced AI models are "months away" from disrupting businesses and governments, fundamentally altering the cyber threat landscape. The alliance emphasized the need for a coordinated response to address the escalating risks of AI-driven attacks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
MAY 2026
725
APRIL 2026
725
MARCH 2026
723
FEBRUARY 2026
723
JANUARY 2026
722
DECEMBER 2025
739
Cyber Attack
19 Dec 2025 • Tencent Cloud
Cloudflare: Aisuru botnet sets new record with 31.4 Tbps DDoS attack
Record-Breaking DDoS Attack by Aisuru/Kimwolf Botnet Peaks at 31.4 Tbps
720
CRITICAL-19
CLO1769705152
Record-Breaking DDoS Attack by Aisuru/Kimwolf Botnet Peaks at 31.4 Tbps
On December 19, Cloudflare mitigated a historic distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack launched by the Aisuru (also known as Kimwolf) botnet, reaching an unprecedented 31.4 Tbps and 200 million requests per second (rps). The campaign, dubbed "The Night Before Christmas," targeted telecommunications providers, IT organizations, and Cloudflare’s own infrastructure with hyper-volumetric HTTP and Layer 4 DDoS attacks.
This attack surpassed Aisuru’s previous record of 29.7 Tbps, set earlier, and another Microsoft-attributed assault peaking at 15.72 Tbps from 500,000 IP addresses. Over 90% of the attacks in the campaign peaked between 1-5 Tbps, with most lasting 1-2 minutes. Despite their scale, Cloudflare’s automated systems detected and mitigated them without triggering internal alerts.
The botnet’s power stems from compromised IoT devices and routers, though the December attacks primarily originated from Android TVs. Cloudflare’s 2025 Q4 DDoS Threat Report revealed a 121% year-over-year increase in DDoS attacks, with 47.1 million incidents recorded in 2025 averaging 5,376 attacks per hour. Network-layer attacks dominated (73%), while HTTP-based assaults made up the remainder.
The most targeted industries included telecommunications, IT services, gambling, and gaming, with China, Hong Kong, Germany, Brazil, and the U.S. bearing the brunt of attacks. Bangladesh was the largest source of attacks, followed by Ecuador, Indonesia, and Argentina, while Russia dropped to 10th place. The report also noted a 600% increase in network-layer attacks exceeding 100 million packets per second (Mpps) and a 65% quarter-over-quarter rise in attacks over 1 Tbps. Over 71.5% of HTTP DDoS attacks were linked to known botnets.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
DECEMBER 2025
758
Cyber Attack
01 Dec 2025 • Tencent Cloud
Alibaba Cloud, Tencent Cloud, AWS, Microsoft Azure, LangFlow and NVIDIA: VoidLink Malware Framework Targets Kubernetes and AI Workloads in New Cyber Attack Wave
VoidLink Malware Framework Exposes Critical Gaps in Kubernetes and AI Workload Security
739
CRITICAL-19
KUBNVITENALIAMAMIC1772627215
VoidLink Malware Framework Exposes Critical Gaps in Kubernetes and AI Workload Security
In December 2025, Check Point Research disclosed VoidLink, a sophisticated Linux malware framework designed to infiltrate cloud-native and AI workloads, marking a shift in how threat actors target modern infrastructure. Developed by the previously unknown advanced persistent threat (APT) group UAT-9921 active since at least 2019 VoidLink is purpose-built for stealthy, long-term persistence in containerized and Kubernetes environments, rather than repurposed from legacy Windows tooling.
The malware employs advanced evasion techniques, including rootkit-style tactics, in-memory execution, self-modifying code, and anti-analysis checks to remain fileless and undetectable by traditional security tools. It fingerprints its environment to identify major cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure, Alibaba, Tencent) and adapts its behavior based on whether it runs on bare metal, VMs, Docker containers, or Kubernetes pods. Once deployed typically via stolen credentials or exploited enterprise services like Java serialization flaws VoidLink harvests cloud metadata, credentials, and secrets, enabling command-and-control (C2), lateral movement, and internal reconnaissance.
Cisco Talos highlighted VoidLink’s compile-on-demand capability, describing it as a near-production-ready foundation for AI-enabled attack frameworks that dynamically generate tools for operators. The framework’s design, deemed "defense contractor-grade," underscores a broader trend: adversaries are increasingly focusing on Kubernetes, microservices, and AI workloads as primary attack surfaces.
Recent campaigns reflect this evolution. ShadowRay 2.0 and the TeamPCP worm have weaponized AI infrastructure, hijacking GPU clusters and Kubernetes environments to create self-propagating botnets using LLM-generated payloads and privileged DaemonSets. Meanwhile, container escape vulnerabilities like NVIDIAScape (CVE-2025-23266) demonstrated how minor Dockerfile misconfigurations could grant host-level root access, with researchers estimating exposure in over a third of cloud environments. The AI supply chain is also under siege, with threats ranging from LangFlow RCE enabling remote code execution and account takeovers to malicious Keras models executing arbitrary code when loaded from public repositories. Security researchers have identified nearly 100 poisoned machine-learning models on trusted platforms, revealing how even "safe" AI assets can conceal backdoors.
Industry data underscores the urgency: Red Hat reports that 90% of organizations experienced at least one Kubernetes security incident in the past year, while container-based lateral movement in Kubernetes environments surged in 2025. VoidLink’s evasion tactics encrypting code, operating in memory, and tampering with user-space observability exploit a critical blind spot in many security programs. Traditional detection methods, reliant on user-space agents and log-based monitoring, struggle to counter threats designed to bypass them.
To address this gap, runtime security solutions like Hypershield developed by Isovalent (now part of Cisco) leverage eBPF to provide kernel-level observability and enforcement. By deploying eBPF programs in the Linux kernel, Hypershield monitors process execution, syscalls, file access, and network activity in real time, mapping events to Kubernetes namespaces, pods, and workload identities. Cisco’s analysis demonstrates how Hypershield can track and mitigate VoidLink across its kill chain, circumventing the malware’s evasion tactics by detecting behavior directly at the kernel level.
The rise of VoidLink and similar threats such as AI-driven botnets and supply chain exploits highlights a stark reality: many organizations lack visibility and control within Kubernetes environments, where AI models and core business workloads operate. While investments in endpoint, identity, and cloud monitoring have grown, they have not kept pace with the shift to workload-centric security. Integrating kernel-level runtime telemetry into SOC workflows is now critical to detecting and containing these attacks in real time. Cisco’s approach combines Hypershield’s eBPF-based enforcement with platforms like Splunk to correlate workload signals with broader security operations, offering a model for defending against cloud-native, AI-aware threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
NOVEMBER 2025
758
OCTOBER 2025
758
SEPTEMBER 2025
758
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Tencent Cloud ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Tencent Cloud's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Tencent Cloud ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Tencent Cloud's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?