Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tempel a Worthington Steel CompanyTempel a Worthington Steel Company
VS
The Hershey CompanyThe Hershey Company
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

5500 North Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, IL, US, 60640

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
679/1000Weak

With over 75+ years of experience, we're a leading manufacturer of high-precision magnetic steel laminations for autos, motors, generators, transformers and beyond.

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:616
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
The Hershey Company

The Hershey Company

19 E Chocolate Ave, Hershey, 17033, US

Last Update: 01/10/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

The Hershey Company is headquartered in Hershey, Pa., and is an industry-leading snacks company with a purpose to make more moments of goodness through its iconic brands. Hershey has approximately 20,000 employees around the world who work every day to deliver delicious...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:10,732
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Hershey Company

The Hershey Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tempel a Worthington Steel Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Hershey Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Hershey Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Hershey Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEM1769208314
The Hershey Company

The Hershey Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE425072625

FAQ

Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and The Hershey Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and The Hershey Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and The Hershey Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company or The Hershey Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company or The Hershey Company ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and The Hershey Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and The Hershey Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA