Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tempel a Worthington Steel CompanyTempel a Worthington Steel Company
VS
Procter & GambleProcter & Gamble
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

5500 North Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, IL, US, 60640

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
679/1000Weak

With over 75+ years of experience, we're a leading manufacturer of high-precision magnetic steel laminations for autos, motors, generators, transformers and beyond.

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:616
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble

2 P&G Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45202

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pg.com
845/1000Good

P&G was founded more than 185 years ago as a soap and candle company. Today, we’re one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies and home to iconic, trusted brands, including Always®, Charmin®, Braun®, Fairy®, Febreze®, Gillette®, Head & Shoulders®, Oral B®, Pante...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:97,366
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tempel a Worthington Steel Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Procter & Gamble (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Procter & Gamble cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Tempel a Worthington Steel Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEM1769208314
Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company company and Procter & Gamble company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and Procter & Gamble, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and Procter & Gamble, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company or Procter & Gamble ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tempel a Worthington Steel Company or Procter & Gamble ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and Procter & Gamble, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tempel a Worthington Steel Company and Procter & Gamble, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8