Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TELUS Digital BrazilTELUS Digital Brazil
VS
PedidosYaPedidosYa
TELUS Digital Brazil

TELUS Digital Brazil

Rua Dom Pedro II, 10th Floor, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, BR, 90550141

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Welcome to TELUS Digital Brazil (formerly Poatek), where innovation meets impact. As an award-winning digital product consultancy, we're shaping the future of digital experiences through cutting-edge technology, agile thinking, and a culture that puts people first. We a...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:13,651
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TELUS Digital Brazil

TELUS Digital Brazil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TELUS Digital Brazil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TELUS Digital Brazil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TELUS Digital Brazil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TELUS Digital Brazil

TELUS Digital Brazil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil company and PedidosYa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TELUS Digital Brazil or PedidosYa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TELUS Digital Brazil or PedidosYa ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil and PedidosYa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TELUS Digital Brazil and PedidosYa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9