Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Telia Cygate OyTelia Cygate Oy
VS
MastercardMastercard
Telia Cygate Oy

Telia Cygate Oy

Pasilan asema-aukio 1, Helsinki, 00520, FI

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

Haluamme olla asiakkaillemme paras ICT-kumppani. Nykyiset ja tulevat huippuosaajamme ovat avainasemassa tavoitteen toteuttamisessa. Tarjoamme asiakkaillemme uniikin yhdistelmän tietoturvallisia ICT-ratkaisuja ja -palveluita. Huippuosaamisemme perustuu tietoturvan ja ti...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:411
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mastercard

Mastercard

2000 Purchase St, Purchase, NY, US, 10577

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mastercard.com
832/1000Good

Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we’re building a sustainable economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, si...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:46,686
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Telia Cygate Oy

Telia Cygate Oy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mastercard

Mastercard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telia Cygate Oy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mastercard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Telia Cygate Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telia Cygate Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mastercard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mastercard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Telia Cygate Oy

Telia Cygate Oy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mastercard

Mastercard

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MAS05510423

FAQ

Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy company and Mastercard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy and Mastercard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy and Mastercard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Telia Cygate Oy or Mastercard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Telia Cygate Oy or Mastercard ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy and Mastercard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Telia Cygate Oy and Mastercard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA