Comparison Overview
Telia Cygate Oy

Telia Cygate Oy
Pasilan asema-aukio 1, Helsinki, 00520, FI
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Haluamme olla asiakkaillemme paras ICT-kumppani. Nykyiset ja tulevat huippuosaajamme ovat avainasemassa tavoitteen toteuttamisessa. Tarjoamme asiakkaillemme uniikin yhdistelmän tietoturvallisia ICT-ratkaisuja ja -palveluita. Huippuosaamisemme perustuu tietoturvan ja ti...

inDrive
Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Telia Cygate Oy







inDrive






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Telia Cygate Oy in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.
Incident History - Telia Cygate Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telia Cygate Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)
inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Telia Cygate Oy

inDrive
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.