Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Teletrac NavmanTeletrac Navman
VS
Xiaomi TechnologyXiaomi Technology
Teletrac Navman

Teletrac Navman

3100 Sanders Rd, Suite 150, Northbrook, Illinois, US, 60062

Last Update: 07/07/2026

View Profile
669/1000Weak

Teletrac Navman aims to be the driving force behind the industries that transform and sustain our futures by offering simple and intelligent solutions that enhance efficiency, safety, and sustainability. As a connected mobility platform for industries that manage vehicl...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:858
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

No. 33 Xi erqi Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing,100085,China, Beijing, CN

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mi.com/global
809/1000Good

Xiaomi Corporation was founded in April 2010 and listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 9, 2018 (1810.HK). Xiaomi is a consumer electronics and smart manufacturing company with smartphones and smart hardware connected by an IoT platform at its ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:26,139
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Teletrac Navman

Teletrac Navman

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Teletrac Navman has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Xiaomi Technology has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Teletrac Navman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teletrac Navman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Xiaomi Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xiaomi Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Teletrac Navman

Teletrac Navman

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TELKIWALDBHP1783413728
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OPPXIAAND1772310272
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
XIA1768816067
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
XIA605062425

FAQ

Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Teletrac Navman company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Teletrac Navman and Xiaomi Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Teletrac Navman and Xiaomi Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Teletrac Navman or Xiaomi Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Teletrac Navman or Xiaomi Technology ?
Between Teletrac Navman and Xiaomi Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Teletrac Navman and Xiaomi Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2