Comparison Overview
Telespazio LATAM
Telespazio LATAM
Av Juan B Justo 837, Capital Federal, 1425, AR
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Telespazio LATAM opera en Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, Colômbia y Brasil. Telespazio LATAM cuenta con un amplio portafolio de soluciones tecnológicas y con el respaldo de un grupo con más de sesenta años de trayectoria en el mercado. El grupo Telespazio es líd...
General Dynamics
11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 22/09/2026
From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs ove...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Telespazio LATAM
General Dynamics
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Telespazio LATAM in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Dynamics has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Telespazio LATAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telespazio LATAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Telespazio LATAM
General Dynamics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.