Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Progress Telerik and Kendo UIProgress Telerik and Kendo UI
VS
IDEMIAIDEMIA
Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

14 Oak Park Drive, Bedford, MA, 01730, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.telerik.com
748/1000Moderate

What do we do? Where do we begin? We build feature-rich, make-your-dev-life-easier UI components for your favorite .NET & JavaScript frameworks. Components for web, mobile, desktop, cross-platform - run your app wherever you want to. Who are we to stop you, after all. ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IDEMIA

IDEMIA

2 place Samuel Champlain, Courbevoie, 92400, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

IDEMIA Secure Transactions (IST) is a leading provider of payment, connectivity, and cybersecurity solutions, serving billions of people worldwide. With decades of expertise in cryptography and credential issuance, IST is trusted by over 2000 financial institutions, mob...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,635
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IDEMIA

IDEMIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress Telerik and Kendo UI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDEMIA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Progress Telerik and Kendo UI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress Telerik and Kendo UI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IDEMIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDEMIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

Progress Telerik and Kendo UI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IDEMIA

IDEMIA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI company and IDEMIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI and IDEMIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI and IDEMIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Progress Telerik and Kendo UI or IDEMIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Progress Telerik and Kendo UI or IDEMIA ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI and IDEMIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Progress Telerik and Kendo UI and IDEMIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5