Comparison Overview
Telenor IoT

Telenor IoT
Garvis Carlssons gata 3, Solna, Stockholm, SE, 169 51
Last Update: 19/03/2026
For more than 20 years, we’ve helped enterprises connect and manage millions of devices worldwide. The result is long-term partnerships, reliable and secure operations, and customer satisfaction that consistently ranks among the highest in the industry. Backed by the s...

Ericsson
Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Telenor IoT







Ericsson






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Telenor IoT in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Ericsson has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Telenor IoT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telenor IoT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Telenor IoT

Ericsson
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.