Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T SportT Sport
VS
OpenreachOpenreach
T Sport

T Sport

N/A

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telekom.de/sport
770/1000Fair

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Openreach

Openreach

6 Gracechurch Street, London, EC3V 0AT, GB

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

We’re the people who make the net work. As the nation’s largest wholesale broadband network, we’re rolling out Ultrafast Full Fibre broadband across the UK. It’s our fastest and most reliable broadband yet, and we’re well on our way to making it available to 25m homes ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,846
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T Sport

T Sport

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Openreach

Openreach

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T Sport in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Openreach has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - T Sport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T Sport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Openreach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Openreach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T Sport

T Sport

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Openreach

Openreach

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
VIROPE1769597077

FAQ

Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T Sport company and Openreach company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T Sport and Openreach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T Sport and Openreach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T Sport or Openreach ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T Sport or Openreach ?
Between T Sport and Openreach, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T Sport and Openreach, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9