Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Telegram MessengerTelegram Messenger
VS
ProsusProsus
Telegram Messenger

Telegram Messenger

Business Central Towers, Tower A, Dubai, 501919, AE

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.telegram.org
707/1000Moderate

Pure instant messaging — simple, fast, secure, and synced across all your devices.

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:3,391
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
13
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3
Prosus

Prosus

Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://prosus.com
789/1000Fair

Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geogra...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,329
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Telegram Messenger

Telegram Messenger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prosus

Prosus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Telegram Messenger has 702.47% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Telegram Messenger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telegram Messenger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Telegram Messenger

Telegram Messenger

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TEL1790346347
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SIETELNORNAT1789568886
🔒 Incident : Breach
TELGITSTROPE1787733436
Prosus

Prosus

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Telegram Messenger company and Prosus company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Telegram Messenger and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Telegram Messenger and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Telegram Messenger or Prosus ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Telegram Messenger or Prosus ?
Between Telegram Messenger and Prosus, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Telegram Messenger and Prosus, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3