Comparison Overview
Telefónica Tech

Telefónica Tech
Ronda de la Comunicación, Madrid, 28050, ES
Last Update: 21/06/2026
We accelerate tech adoption through our services of Cyber Security, Cloud, IoT, Big Data, AI and Blockchain. Follow on our social media channels: • X: https://x.com/TefTech_EN • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/telefonicatech_en/ • YouTube: https://www.youtube.c...

Reliance Communications
A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, 400710, IN
Last Update: 08/09/2026
Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Ne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Telefónica Tech







Reliance Communications






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Telefónica Tech in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2026.
Incident History - Telefónica Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Telefónica Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Telefónica Tech

Reliance Communications
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.