Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Telefónica Public PolicyTelefónica Public Policy
VS
vivovivo
Telefónica Public Policy

Telefónica Public Policy

Ronda de la Comunicación, Madrid, 28050, ES

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.telefonica.com/en/about-us/public-policy-and-regulation/
755/1000Fair

Telefonica's public policy recommendations to create an open and safe Internet for all and unleash the full potential of the digital economy.

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
vivo

vivo

No.283 BBK Road, Wusha, Chang'an, Dongguan, Guangdong, China, Dongguan, 523860, CN

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vivo.com/en
781/1000Fair

vivo is a technology company that creates great products based on a design-driven value, with smart devices and intelligent services as its core. The company aims to build a bridge between humans and the digital world. Through unique creativity, vivo provides users with...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:19,007
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Telefónica Public Policy

Telefónica Public Policy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
vivo

vivo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telefónica Public Policy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for vivo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Telefónica Public Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telefónica Public Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - vivo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

vivo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Telefónica Public Policy

Telefónica Public Policy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
vivo

vivo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy company and vivo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy and vivo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy and vivo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Telefónica Public Policy or vivo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Telefónica Public Policy or vivo ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy and vivo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Telefónica Public Policy and vivo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES