Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Telefónica Open FutureTelefónica Open Future
VS
HCLTechHCLTech
Telefónica Open Future

Telefónica Open Future

Ronda del Distrito de la Comunicación, Madrid, Community of Madrid, ES, 28050

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Red de aceleradoras de startups pre-seed de Telefónica en conjunto con socios. Somos la principal aceleradora de startups de dimensión global con capilaridad regional y contamos con más de 35 hubs en España, Argentina, Perú, y Costa Rica. Aceleramos grandes equipos c...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HCLTech

HCLTech

Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN, 201301

Last Update: 11/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hcltech.com
812/1000Good

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 223,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around AI, digital, engineering, cloud and software, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:257,190
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Telefónica Open Future

Telefónica Open Future

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HCLTech

HCLTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telefónica Open Future in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

HCLTech has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Telefónica Open Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telefónica Open Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HCLTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Telefónica Open Future

Telefónica Open Future

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HCLTech

HCLTech

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292

FAQ

Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Telefónica Open Future company and HCLTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Telefónica Open Future and HCLTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Telefónica Open Future and HCLTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Telefónica Open Future or HCLTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Telefónica Open Future or HCLTech ?
Between Telefónica Open Future and HCLTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Telefónica Open Future and HCLTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9