Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Teladoc Health UKTeladoc Health UK
VS
M42 HealthM42 Health
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

Aspect House, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XE, GB

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

The world's leading Virtual Healthcare provider. From 24/7 virtual GPs, physiotherapy, second medical opinion, nutrition, and mental health support - we deliver excellent clinical outcomes - 96% of users recommend us. Teladoc Health UK leverages more than 20 years of e...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
M42 Health

M42 Health

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://m42.ae/
784/1000Fair

M42 is an Abu Dhabi-based, global tech-enabled healthcare company operating at the forefront of medical advancement. The company is seeking to transform lives through innovative clinical solutions that can solve the world’s most critical health and diagnostic challenges...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,168
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
M42 Health

M42 Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teladoc Health UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M42 Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Teladoc Health UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teladoc Health UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - M42 Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M42 Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
M42 Health

M42 Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and M42 Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and M42 Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and M42 Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Teladoc Health UK or M42 Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Teladoc Health UK or M42 Health ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and M42 Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and M42 Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3