Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Teladoc Health UKTeladoc Health UK
VS
BrightSpring Health ServicesBrightSpring Health Services
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

Aspect House, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XE, GB

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

The world's leading Virtual Healthcare provider. From 24/7 virtual GPs, physiotherapy, second medical opinion, nutrition, and mental health support - we deliver excellent clinical outcomes - 96% of users recommend us. Teladoc Health UK leverages more than 20 years of e...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

805 N Whittington Pkwy, Louisville, 40222, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

BrightSpring is the parent company of a family of services and brands that provides clinical, nonclinical, pharmacy and ancillary care services for people of all ages, health and skill levels across home and community settings. The company is a leading provider of div...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,725
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teladoc Health UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrightSpring Health Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Teladoc Health UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teladoc Health UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BrightSpring Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrightSpring Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Teladoc Health UK

Teladoc Health UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BrightSpring Health Services

BrightSpring Health Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI1025072825

FAQ

Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Teladoc Health UK company and BrightSpring Health Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and BrightSpring Health Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and BrightSpring Health Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Teladoc Health UK or BrightSpring Health Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Teladoc Health UK or BrightSpring Health Services ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and BrightSpring Health Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Teladoc Health UK and BrightSpring Health Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9