Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitetTekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet
VS
EFEF
Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

Mäster Mattias väg 8, Linköping, 581 83, SE

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet är en av Sveriges stora tekniska högskolor, med ca 14 800 studenter och mer än 1 000 anställda. Med campus i Linköping, Norrköping och på Lidingö utbildar vi ingenjörer, fysiker, kemister, biologer, matematiker, datavetare,...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EF

EF

Selnaustrasse 30, Zurich, 8001, CH

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile

Founded in 1965 in Sweden, EF (Education First) is a global association of education companies that shares a common mission of opening the world through education, offering language, academic, cultural exchange and education travel programs. Some companies are in the ...

NAICS:61
NAICS Definition:Educational Services
Employees:20,417
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EF

EF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EF in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EF

EF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet company and EF company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet and EF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet and EF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet or EF ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet or EF ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet and EF, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet and EF, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93436
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93435
SUMMARY

redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-87701
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-85917
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85889
SUMMARY

Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9