Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KGtegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG
VS
Winn-DixieWinn-Dixie
tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

Gerloser Weg 72 , Fulda, 36039, DE

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tegut.com
833/1000Good

tegut... ist ein Handelsunternehmen mit dem Ziel, den Menschen gute Lebensmittel anzubieten. Mit mehr als 330 Lebensmittelmärkten ist tegut... in Hessen, Thüringen, Bayern, Baden-Württemberg sowie Rheinland-Pfalz und Göttingen vertreten. Noch mehr Infos findet ihr auf...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:849
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Winn-Dixie

Winn-Dixie

5050 Edgewood Ct, Jacksonville, 32254, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.winn-dixie.com
775/1000Fair

Founded in 1925, Winn-Dixie grocery stores, liquor stores and in-store pharmacies serve communities throughout five southeastern states - Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Mississippi. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. is a subsidiary of The Winn-Dixie Company, which is on...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:13,989
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Winn-Dixie

Winn-Dixie

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Winn-Dixie in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Winn-Dixie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Winn-Dixie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TEG18568922
Winn-Dixie

Winn-Dixie

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG company and Winn-Dixie company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG and Winn-Dixie, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG and Winn-Dixie, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG or Winn-Dixie ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG or Winn-Dixie ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG and Winn-Dixie, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between tegut... gute Lebensmittel GmbH & Co. KG and Winn-Dixie, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85456
SUMMARY

MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-85455
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85454
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-85453
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-85452
SUMMARY

MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8