Comparison Overview
Tecta America Dakotas

Tecta America Dakotas
2315 7th Ave N, Fargo, North Dakota, US, 58102
Last Update: 07/03/2026
Tecta America Dakotas, a commercial roofing contractor, began business in 1917. For 100 years, our customers in North Dakota have counted on our dependable service and quality workmanship, allowing us to grow into the largest roofing contractor in the region. We have l...

COLAS
1, Rue du Colonel Pierre Avia, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Colas, a subsidiary of the Bouygues Group, is a major player in the construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure and urban development. Colas covers the entire value chain: from industrial production to service offerings, including construction work. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tecta America Dakotas







COLAS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tecta America Dakotas in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2026.
Incident History - Tecta America Dakotas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tecta America Dakotas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tecta America Dakotas

COLAS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.