Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tecta America Commercial RoofingTecta America Commercial Roofing
VS
Tata ProjectsTata Projects
Tecta America Commercial Roofing

Tecta America Commercial Roofing

9450 Bryn Mawr Ave, Rosemont, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.tectaamerica.com
593/1000Very Poor

Tecta America Corp. is the nation’s leading roofing contractor. We have over 100 locations and 4,400 qualified roofing professionals nationwide, Tecta America is the largest commercial roofing contractor in the U.S., providing roofing solutions nationwide. Tecta offers ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:1,986
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tataprojects.com
809/1000Good

Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:19,310
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tecta America Commercial Roofing

Tecta America Commercial Roofing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecta America Commercial Roofing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tecta America Commercial Roofing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecta America Commercial Roofing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tecta America Commercial Roofing

Tecta America Commercial Roofing

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEC5592555091025
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEC041090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEC837072725
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing company and Tata Projects company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing and Tata Projects, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing and Tata Projects, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tecta America Commercial Roofing or Tata Projects ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tecta America Commercial Roofing or Tata Projects ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing and Tata Projects, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tecta America Commercial Roofing and Tata Projects, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8