Techsecure
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749
None
NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Comparison Overview
Techsecure
VS
T-Mobile
T-Mobile
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 550 and 599
T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is America’s supercharged Un-carrier, delivering an advanced 4G LTE and transformative nationwide 5G network that will offer reliable connectivity for all. T-Mobile’s customers benefit from its unmatched combination of value and quality, unwavering obsession with offering them the best possible service experience and undisputable drive for disruption that creates competition and innovation in wireless and beyond. Based in Bellevue, Wash., T-Mobile provides services through its subsidiaries and operates its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile. For more information, please visit: https://www.t-mobile.com.
NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 89,361
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
18
Attack type number
4
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Techsecure
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
T-Mobile
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Techsecure
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
T-Mobile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Techsecure in 2025.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
T-Mobile has 69.49% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History — Techsecure (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Techsecure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
T-Mobile
Incidents
Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Passive Eavesdropping, Unencrypted Satellite Transmissions, Lack of Signal Encryption
Motivation: Academic Research, Security Awareness, Vulnerability Disclosure
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Routing Infrastructure
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Routing Infrastructure
Motivation: Surveillance, Espionage
Blog: Blog
FAQ
Techsecure company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to T-Mobile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
T-Mobile company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Techsecure company.
In the current year, T-Mobile company has reported more cyber incidents than Techsecure company.
Neither T-Mobile company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Both T-Mobile company and Techsecure company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.
T-Mobile company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Techsecure company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Both Techsecure company and T-Mobile company have disclosed vulnerabilities.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
T-Mobile company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Techsecure company.
T-Mobile company employs more people globally than Techsecure company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Techsecure nor T-Mobile holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description
FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description
PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description
NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
