Comparison Overview

Techsecure

VS

Motorola Solutions

Techsecure

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

None

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Motorola Solutions

500 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, US, 60661
Last Update: 2025-12-01

About Motorola Solutions | Solving for safer Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do at Motorola Solutions. We build and connect technologies to help protect people, property and places. Our solutions foster the collaboration that’s critical for safer communities, safer schools, safer hospitals, safer businesses, and ultimately, safer nations. Learn more about our commitment to innovating for a safer future for us all at www.motorolasolutions.com.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 25,588
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Techsecure
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Motorola Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Techsecure in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Motorola Solutions has 238.98% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Techsecure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Techsecure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Motorola Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Techsecure
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploited vulnerability in cloud storage service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Motorola Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Techsecure company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Techsecure and Motorola Solutions have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Motorola Solutions company has reported more cyber incidents than Techsecure company.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Motorola Solutions company and Techsecure company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor Techsecure company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Techsecure company and Motorola Solutions company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Motorola Solutions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Techsecure company.

Motorola Solutions company employs more people globally than Techsecure company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Techsecure nor Motorola Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X