Comparison Overview
Tech One Global Ltd

Tech One Global Ltd
No:185/4, Havelock Road, , Colombo 05, Western Province, LK
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Driven by a passion for innovation, Tech One Global has grown into the region’s leading solutions integrator and Microsoft Partner. For over a decade, our 150 technical experts and 500 seasoned professionals have delivered best-in-class services by combining regional ex...

Iron Mountain
33 Arch St, Boston, 02110, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
In the era of AI, your data is your advantage. Yet too often it remains untapped: disconnected from systems, underutilized, untrained, and exposed to risk. Iron Mountain is the trusted partner for organizations of all sizes to unlock what’s possible, transforming inform...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tech One Global Ltd







Iron Mountain






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tech One Global Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain in 2026.
Incident History - Tech One Global Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tech One Global Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Iron Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Iron Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tech One Global Ltd

Iron Mountain
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.