Comparison Overview
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich
Arcisstraße 21, München, Munich, Bavaria, DE, 80333
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our...

CEA
Bâtiment Le Ponant D, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The CEA is the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission ("Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives"). It is a public body established in October 1945 by General de Gaulle. A leader in research, development and innovation, the CEA m...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Technical University of Munich







CEA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Technical University of Munich in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CEA in 2026.
Incident History - Technical University of Munich (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Technical University of Munich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Technical University of Munich

CEA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.