Comparison Overview
Technische Unie

Technische Unie
Bovenkerkerweg 10-12, Amstelveen, NL, 1185 XE
Last Update: 22/03/2026
Met 280.000 artikelen van 700 leveranciers wereldwijd biedt Technische Unie een breed assortiment technische installatiematerialen voor woningbouw, utiliteit, industrie, overheid, zorg en detailhandel. Een technische groothandel in installatiemateriaal op het gebied van...

Fastenal
2001 Theurer Blvd, Winona, MN, US, 55987
Last Update: 02/04/2026
By providing three things – truly local service, the world’s largest vending program, and unmatched inventory management – Fastenal saves your business time and money. Who are Fastenal's customers? • Organizations wanting to strengthen their supply chains. • Business...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Technische Unie







Fastenal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Technische Unie in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fastenal in 2026.
Incident History - Technische Unie (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Technische Unie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fastenal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fastenal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Technische Unie

Fastenal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.