Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Technische Unie DuurzaamTechnische Unie Duurzaam
VS
NCCNCC
Technische Unie Duurzaam

Technische Unie Duurzaam

Amstelveen, 1185 XE, NL

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.technischeunie.nl/portal/themas/duurzaamheid/
754/1000Fair

Wij maken het u graag gemakkelijk met ons brede duurzame assortiment, slimme oplossingen, efficiëntieverhogende diensten en specialistisch, duurzaam advies.

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:96
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NCC

NCC

Herrjärva Torg 4, Stockholm, Solna, SE, 170 67

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ncc.com
759/1000Fair

NCC is one of the leading construction companies in the Nordics. Based on its expertise in managing complex construction processes, NCC contributes to a positive impact of construction for its customers and society. NCC is one of the largest players in the Nordic cons...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:12,952
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Technische Unie Duurzaam

Technische Unie Duurzaam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NCC

NCC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technische Unie Duurzaam in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Technische Unie Duurzaam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technische Unie Duurzaam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Technische Unie Duurzaam

Technische Unie Duurzaam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NCC

NCC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam company and NCC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Technische Unie Duurzaam or NCC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Technische Unie Duurzaam or NCC ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam and NCC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Technische Unie Duurzaam and NCC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES