Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Techint GroupTechint Group
VS
Mitsubishi Heavy IndustriesMitsubishi Heavy Industries
Techint Group

Techint Group

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AR

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://techintgroup.com/
788/1000Fair

A group of companies that act worldwide, global or regional leaders in their fields, with deep roots in the countries where they operate, each with its own aims and strategies but all partaking an original philosophy of long term presence, commitment to local developmen...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:42,059
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP, 100-8332

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.mhi.com
814/1000Good

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:15,576
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Techint Group

Techint Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Techint Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Techint Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Techint Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Techint Group

Techint Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Techint Group company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Techint Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Techint Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Techint Group or Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Techint Group or Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ?
Between Techint Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Techint Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA